Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Panorama Of Childish Creationist Argumen...

It's sad that some people actually pay to hear this guy talk. This God-pushing presenter is now in jail for fraud.

  • Views: 5702
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

View All

Your Macromedia's Flash Player
may be out of date


Click here to upgrade your flash player.

You may also get this message if you have disabled your javascript. You must enable it to view videos.



Trouble playing the video? Click here to download the original.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.48 out of 5 based on 50 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

ThatsLife : LVL 12: VP 2.1: said:

ThatsLife

-4 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 13 hours ago...

Wasn't the theory of Evolution 20-100 years old? the FUCK are you on about?

LithuanianLabourer : LVL 28: VP 3.7: said:

LithuanianLabourer

4 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 13 hours ago...

ThatsLife ---->

You have never seen a monkey . I've seen a chimp and played with it . It's like a human , but dumber . When it is with humans it is trying to copy them and act like them . If human child becomes a part of a pack of monkeys , it grows up to be a monkey .

"The transmutation of species was accepted by many scientists before 1859, but Charles Darwin's On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection provided the first convincing exposition of a mechanism by which evolutionary change could occur: natural selection. "

Roland Deschain : LVL 19: VP 2.8: said:

Roland Deschain

8 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 13 hours ago...

@creamy_napalm:

Hopefully you aren't talking about censoring Spiked Humor just because YOU disagree with the ideas/views of a video. This site has an excellent community based filter that keep bad videos from making it to the front page (and this video passed the grade by a fair margin). Spiked Humor would soon die out if all videos were neutral and balanced as you seem to suggest.

(Or are you just saying that all videos should be pay proper respect to all religious views, no matter how laughably ridiculous their claims are: like the fact that the evil scientists had to shrink Africa to justify plate tectonics).

If you agree with Kent Hovind, then most likely you are a fundamentalist creationist. I have no desire to meet you. There are very few people I have less respect for in this world. To believe that the Earth is 6000 years old is to approach the level of ignorance and nescience of believing that the Sun revolves around the Earth.

LeighCedar : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

LeighCedar

4 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 13 hours ago...

Thatslife,

Give it up. No one is claiming that we evolved from a monkey except you and Dr. Dino.

What LL was saying about old science is true. Hovind takes his "facts" from old creationst "theories" that have been disproved decades ago.. he just fails to tell you that.
Furthermore, when he tries to disprove evolution it is by bringing up old theories that have also been fixed or discarded. He is either failing to research properly.. or more likely, just spreading misinformation.

ThatsLife : LVL 12: VP 2.1: said:

ThatsLife

-6 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 13 hours ago...

Okay...I guess the same arguments could go for a parrot aswell, correct? I mean, they can copy what we say. Is this not a valid argument?

And Charles Darwin even said HIMSELF that no change in one species to another has ever been recorded, and he adds that we can never record the transformation from one species to another. Ever. So what's the proof that evolution is 100% factual? A few mislead findings and a dead mans theory...ooooh.

ThatsLife : LVL 12: VP 2.1: said:

ThatsLife

-5 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 13 hours ago...

LeighCedar, maybe you've been out of school for too long...but they teach exactly what he's disproving in all of his videos. They teach in SCHOOL that we evolved from monkey's. They teach us in school everything that you guys say they aren't...so I don't know where you got your education from but in my country, which has an exquisite reputation for herding in Americans and Brits.

LeighCedar : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

LeighCedar

2 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 13 hours ago...

^ Dude.. seriously... go back to all the other threads where you have posted on this... where Roland, and Lith and D! and I give you these answers. You haven't added anything new, or disproven anything.

Roland Deschain : LVL 19: VP 2.8: said:

Roland Deschain

2 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 12 hours ago...

ThatsLife
Not exatly, ThatsLife. It's more like one dead mans theory and 185,000 scientific articles (in the last 75 years) that support and enhance the simple fact of evolution originally succinctly proposed by Darwin. It's quite funny how creationists focus on Darwin in a desperate attempt to blind themselves to the overwhelming amount of evidence that came after Darwin.

ThatsLife : LVL 12: VP 2.1: said:

ThatsLife

-3 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 12 hours ago...

^ read my above post.

LeighCedar : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

LeighCedar

1 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 12 hours ago...

Well whereever your school was sucks. They should have taught you that we evolved from a great Ape ancestor, and that the Money line broke off much earlier.
We are closer to Chimps than a chimp is to a monkey.

LithuanianLabourer : LVL 28: VP 3.7: said:

LithuanianLabourer

3 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 12 hours ago...

ThatsLife --->

You are killing me when you are sporting that phrase . Charles Darwin has said it himself and he was right .

"By comparing the anatomies of both modern and extinct species, paleontologists can infer the lineages of those species. Important fossil evidence includes the connection of distinct classes of organisms by so-called "transitional" species, such as the Archaeopteryx, which provided early evidence for intermediate species between dinosaurs and birds, and the recently-discovered Tiktaalik, which clarifies the development from fish to animals with four limbs."

"At present, the most primitive (known) feathered dinosaur is Sinosauropteryx (Jurassic/Cretaceous, 150-120 mya), whose body was covered with feather-like structures that look like hollow tubes, or hairs. They may or may not have had barbs, like downy (plumulaceous) feathers. Another early fossil, Dilong paradoxus (Early Cretaceous), an ancestor of Tyrannosaurus rex, also had similar feather structures. These early fossils suggest that feathers originally developed as insulators, to maintain body temperatures (thus also providing evidence for warm-blooded dinosaurs). Flight would have been a later evolutionary adaptation (or exaptation) of feathers."

"Neutral human DNA sequences are approximately 1.2% divergent (based on substitutions) from those of their nearest genetic relative, the chimpanzee, 1.6% from gorillas, and 6.6% from baboons. Genetic sequence evidence thus allows inference and quantification of genetic relatedness between humans and other apes."

"Evidence for common descent is inferred from traits shared between all living organisms. In Darwin's day, the evidence of shared traits was based solely on visible observation of morphologic similarities, such as the fact that all birds, even those which do not fly, have wings. Today, there is strong evidence from genetics that all organisms have a common ancestor. For example, every living cell makes use of nucleic acids as its genetic material, and uses the same twenty amino acids as the building blocks for proteins. All organisms use the same genetic code (with some extremely rare and minor deviations) to translate nucleic acid sequences into proteins."

Tiktaalik :
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Fishapods.jpg
Archeo
pterix :
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d6/SArchaeopteryxBerlin2.jpg

What do you consider as evidence ?

ThatsLife : LVL 12: VP 2.1: said:

ThatsLife

-4 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 12 hours ago...

Yes, I'm desperately making an attempt to blind myself by using the creator of the evolution theory in my argument. Good game.

Anyways, I'm going to continue to believe what I'm taught in school (taught your little evolution theory and what not) and continue to believe my beliefs to the way I want to believe them.

Have a wonderful day.

ThatsLife : LVL 12: VP 2.1: said:

ThatsLife

-4 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 12 hours ago...

I actually watched a video, (NOT by Dr. Hovind...I admit her over uses the same jokes and isn't funny most of the time, if at all) but the video I watched actually analyzed basically what you JUST said...I'll try and find it.

LeighCedar : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

LeighCedar

2 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 7 hours ago...

^ Just remember Thatslife,
That link I posted above debunks basically everything Hovind has ever asserted.

darkreign : LVL 10: VP 1.9: said:

darkreign

1 votes NegativePositive

1098 days 7 hours ago...

I am surprised creationists have the intelligence to use the internet, or maybe the internet just got dumber.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009