Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Pentagon Plans Strike-first Nuclear Poli...

A doctrine allowing the US pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons in the event of a WMD threat to the country is under development and is awaiting confirmation by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

The option for the use of nuclear weapons would be open if an enemy was using or about to use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against its forces or civilian population, or as a way to destroy the WMD threat.

The philosophy would be designed to work with tactical nuclear weapons whose primary use is underground WMD bunkers. Congress has yet to endorse the warheads because they say it would make it more likely that such weapons would be used or proliferated.

Good luck, America...I wish you well.

New Zealand Herald

  • Scienott
  • posted by Scienott
  • Date 9/12/2005 11:17:55 AM
  • Views: 2266
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Company Policy
  • Company Policy
  • Dress Code - It is advised that you come to work dresse. . .
  • Votes 4.04/5 - Views 424 - Comments 0

View All



Rate This News:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.44 out of 5 based on 422 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

New URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

tehMatthewJ : LVL 27: VP 3.6: said:

tehMatthewJ

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 21 hours ago...

Honestly though, what good does it do if someone blows us all up, to blow them up. Nothing, because we are all blown up. I think it is much more intelligent to try to find a way to effectively intercept a threat, rather than just blow shit up.

Xanthus (Admin) : LVL 27: VP 3.6: said:

Xanthus

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 21 hours ago...

It's called Mutal Assured Destruction. If they know that they will be destroyed if they attack you with nukes, then it's very unlikely that anyone will do it.

SkullFucked : LVL 25: VP 3.4: said:

SkullFucked

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 21 hours ago...

How about we just ban all nuclear weapons? What good is telling people they can't have nuclear weapons when America has their own waiting to be fired.

tehMatthewJ : LVL 27: VP 3.6: said:

tehMatthewJ

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 20 hours ago...

Everyone having them is the same as no one having them. So why don't countries just say "Hey, let me save a few billion dollars by not building these weapons." The world is full of morons and they all want to hold a political office.

Scienott (Admin) : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

Scienott

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 20 hours ago...

Money and power are used in competition, hence nukes.

kadore : LVL 24: VP 3.3: said:

kadore

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 19 hours ago...

so.. let's see this crap, if almighty bushy the bush decides that n. korea has wmd, like he has decided over iraq, he doesn't need to sacrifice thousends of soldiers instead he just wipes out the whole country with nukes..
if that law was enforced pre iraq war, would that mean that usa would nuke iraq even though they never had wmds? and how will they find out if a country has wmd, will they just flip a coin as usual and then nuke it, and afterwards they'd say: "well there was wmd but nuking erased all the evidence"

futurespud : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

futurespud

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 18 hours ago...

Bush: (explaning why he launched nukes to the press) I was Googleing on my comp-u-tator and I noticed some web page saying that Iraq might be planing to use a WMD. So I blogged my bestest friend Rummy Rums and he told me to prevent this from happening...nuke the hell out of the place. So I did. Now go hop in your SUV's and buy some $500 gas...Vote Bush!

Cactus : LVL 24: VP 3.3: said:

Cactus

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 16 hours ago...

"Everyone having them is the same as no one having them." Rubbish, chances are once a country gets pissed off enough to send a nuke, other countrys will start sending nukes also... how the hell is that the same as no one having them?

VegaObscura : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

VegaObscura

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 4 hours ago...

Wow... the US is soooo hypocritcal. They think that only they should be allowed to have WMD. They also seem to think that it's up to them to decide whether or not other governments are doing things right, and if they don't think so, they go and kick out the other government and put a new one in. Theres a REASON the retards are getting their heads cut off, it's not like they were using them anyway.

xenon : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

xenon

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days 4 hours ago...

:) Some of you have sence.

So their plan is to nuke a country if they suspect they are going to use WDM's , which to me is not a good plan with trigger happy yanks. Doesn't matter any way - they are going to do and attack thos countries soon, in our life times. They need a civil wa in the US so badly

deschlayer : LVL 13: VP 2.2: said:

deschlayer

0 votes NegativePositive

1166 days ago...

great now bush will have more power...What else could the world possibly want? So instead of the US fighting a bogus war on false info, we would have started a nucular war on bogus info..... wonderful!

Scienott (Admin) : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

Scienott

0 votes NegativePositive

1165 days 20 hours ago...

I agree that the US shouldn't be granted this power, since they've proved themselves irresponsible in the past.

On the other hand, you have to remind yourself that the biggest bully always wants/needs the best defense - only makes sense.

It's just like in grade school - that's how we should treat most bastard politicians - when you fuck up, you don't deserve privileges or luxuries...

AceW : LVL 2: VP 1.1: said:

AceW

0 votes NegativePositive

1164 days 6 hours ago...

I think it has both pros and cons... it allows the U.S. to have a kind of "you even threaten us and we'll nuke you" kind of power. Then again they might end us launching nukes against someone who, at the current time, had no intention of launching the nukes.

Hey, looks like they've finally forged a powerful sword that will eventually cause them to stab themselves.

(P.s. I am American by the way, and from Florida of all places...)

California : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

California

0 votes NegativePositive

1163 days 22 hours ago...

The only reason we are creating a law for first strike nuclear use is so we can destroy China when they invade Taiwan, which WILL happen between 2007-2014. If you dont belive me do some damn research!
Thanks!

BTW, I really am serious, do the research, its all in the open. China hates us.

ZiGz : LVL 20: VP 2.9: said:

ZiGz

0 votes NegativePositive

1162 days 16 hours ago...

taiwan has a much more advanced army than china, however, china's army is around 7 times larger. not to mention chinese forces would have to travel 125 miles across the straight, while taipei forces blast the fuck out of their amphibious vehicles with american tanks, blast their low-on-gas vintage soviet airforce with american anti aircraft missiles, etc etc.
i know what you're thinking, "but china has nukes! they could just nuke the bastards". that would defeat the purpose of invasion. taiwan pumps billions of dollars into chinese economy.
china wants communism, taiwan wants democracy. america helps taiwan because they believe in this cause. the only threat china has to usa is nuclear strike, invasion is out of the question right now. i would think usa money would be better spent on nuclear defense mechanisms, such as armed sattelites which shoot down missiles before they reach mainland, or even shoot down missiles while still above chinese mainland, right after launch.
as for america using these nukes in any other situation, i see this as america's excuse to say "THEY HAVE WMD'S! WE'RE GONNA BLAST THEM!", when in fact they dont. they just want a change in political power in a target country, or to force their politicians to do what america wants

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Moderators Contest
Prize
Entry Dates: 11/4/2008-12/15/2008