Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Boy's Room Raided -TV Aerial Interferes ...

A schoolboy, Nickie Chamberlain, was surprised when Government officials arrived at his bedroom and confiscated his television aerial because it was interfering with planes landing at a nearby airport.

Nickie, who is 12, had used the booster device for two years to watch cartoons, music channels and Big Brother on his 14-inch television.

But three weeks ago an official from the Office of Communications (Ofcom) turned up at his home claiming the £15 aerial was affecting planes landing at Luton Airport.

According to Ofcom, pilots coming into land at the airport had lost contact with the control tower because the faulty aerial was transmitting on the same frequency as the cockpit radios.

The communication problems meant pilots landing their aircraft had to scramble to change the frequency so they could continue to communicate with the control tower.

Air traffic controllers first noticed the communication problems on the flight path into Luton, which is directly over Nickie's house in Linslade, Beds., on October 6.

An Ofcom engineer was sent round to the house and used a handheld device to trace the signal to the small booster aerial sitting on top of Nickie's TV.

His father, DHL operations manager Dave Chamberlain, 46, said he could not believe a tiny aerial could affect aeroplanes flying over his house.

He said: ''We were told pilots flying over the house were losing contact with the control tower as they came into land.

''The engineer was waiting outside the house when I came home from work and told me pilots had been complaining and they had traced the signal to our house.

''I couldn't believe it and at first I thought the engineer was some sort of conman so I had to carefully check his identification and make sure he was for real.

''Then we went inside and he followed the signal using a special reader to my son's bedroom and his booster aerial - I was absolutely gobsmacked.''

Nickie, who lives in the three bedroom semi-detached house with his dad, brother Glenn, 14 and mother Erika, 42, said he was shocked to have caused so much trouble.

He said: ''When I found out what happened I was upset because I couldn't watch cartoons or the television for a while - but it's better than causing a plane crash.''

The Ofcom representative ordered Mr Chamberlain to dispose of the aerial in the bin.

A spokesman said they had been asked to trace the signal by National Air Traffic Control after complaints from pilots.

According to the spokesman the problem occurred because the faulty aerial started to malfunction and ''self oscillate'' - sending out a range of different frequencies.

The spokesman said: ''You essentially get a sound much like the screeching you get when you put a microphone too close to a loud speaker.

''The booster aerial was, at different stages, giving off the same frequency as the aeroplane radio and that is why the pilots were losing contact.

''Our field engineers regularly work with National Air Traffic control and were able to trace the signal back to this little boys bedroom.

''This is obviously quite unusual.''

A spokeswoman for the NATS said: ''The planes have multiple back-up communication systems and this is not something where any passengers were in any danger.

''Obviously safety is our major concern.''

No one at Luton Airport was available for comment.

Source

  • bajaboy
  • posted by bajaboy
  • Date 10/28/2009 7:06:25 AM
  • Views: 1370
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Lost Control
  • Lost Control
  • A rookie pitcher was struggling at the mound, so the ca. . .
  • Votes 2/5 - Views 15 - Comments 0
  • Video:Traffic Court
  • Traffic Court
  • A New York man was forced to take a day off from work t. . .
  • Votes 3.4/5 - Views 52 - Comments 0
  • Video:Total Control
  • Total Control
  • A guy named Bob is travelling by Amtrak with two strang. . .
  • Votes 4.15/5 - Views 481 - Comments 0
  • Video:Traffic Jam
  • Traffic Jam
  • dont know where this picture was taken..
  • Votes 4.61/5 - Views 3185 - Comments 12
  • Video:Aerial Photos
  • Aerial Photos
  • A photographer for a national magazine was assigned to . . .
  • Votes 3.69/5 - Views 98 - Comments 0
  • Video:Birth Control Pills
  • Birth Control Pills
  • An elderly woman went into the doctor`s office. When th. . .
  • Votes 4.09/5 - Views 305 - Comments 1

View All



Rate This News:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

4.6 out of 5 based on 364 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

New URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

11 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

Uzo : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

Uzo

18 votes NegativePositive

25 days 14 hours ago...

0.o That antenna looks like something off Star Trek ... *and* it makes planes crash. Awesomeness on a stick!

Mark333 : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

Mark333

27 votes NegativePositive

25 days 14 hours ago...

I wonder if Al Qaeda is reading this...

sc1zzen : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

sc1zzen

3 votes NegativePositive

25 days 11 hours ago...

ok........ 1. HOW FUCKING POWERFUL ARE THOSE THINGS? and 2. HOW FUCKING WEAK IS THE TRANSMITTER FRO AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL?

im sorry i just never thought that they would have THAT much power and why do they need to transmit anyway? its an antenna all it has to do it catch a signal and that`s it those powered ones never made much sense to me it was like when electricity first came out EVERYTHING had it.

Mike. : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

Mike.

20 votes NegativePositive

25 days 11 hours ago...

Reading through the article, I was expecting to find something like "the airport was kind enough to give little Nickie a good television set with lots of cartoon channels plus an X-box with a bundle of games as an apology for being complete assholes".

Never happened. My faith in humanity is lost.

Would a television set and an X-box cost more than developing a more secure and advanced radar system or changing the routes of all the planes going through the kid`s house? After all, it`s not his fault he was born there + I assume the parents paid(pay) for the house, while the airlines do not own or pay for the air they are travelling through.

scruples : LVL 27: VP 3.6: said:

scruples

-4 votes NegativePositive

25 days 11 hours ago...

^Mike. if thats your real name!, I guess we should reward someone for having a faulty antenna that interferes and inconveniences millions of people?....& just how was the airport officials being assholes?, oh my god they threw away his 15$ antenna!.

TonyBlue05 : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

TonyBlue05

8 votes NegativePositive

25 days 11 hours ago...

I agree with scruples to some extent. It would have been decent of them if they had given him a replacement antenna/tv, though.

Mike. : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

Mike.

4 votes NegativePositive

25 days 10 hours ago...

scruples, yes, it is my real name.

You shouldn`t see my proposition as a reward. It is rather an alternative the airport officials have to provide. The action they should`ve taken should have been `replaced`, not `removed`.

It said in the article that the item was confiscated. Usually, something illegal is confiscated. In this case, it is private property. Does not matter how much it cost. The fact is: some guys came in and took private property that was fully paid for. As I said earlier, the positioning of the house is not the kid`s fault. It was the airline officials` conscious decision to follow this dangerous route for two years(of this antenna`s activity) without solving the problem.

As for the assholes label, imagine this: you are in a room with someone who is listening to annoying music on their phone through built-in speakers. You do have a pair of spare headphones in your pocket. Do you offer the person your headphones or do you grab their phone, break it in half and throw it in the garbage?

If you chose #2, that makes you an asshole.

Islamisalie : LVL 29: VP 3.8: said:

Islamisalie

-6 votes NegativePositive

25 days 9 hours ago...

^
Mike, you`re an idiot for this reason:

Who was there first? The airport or the family? Chances are the airport. The airport has a right to protect what`s theirs. I`m sure there are laws about all electronic devices, saying they should not cause any interference and any such interference is a federal offense.

There`s nothing in those laws about reimbursement of confiscated items.

Mike. : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

Mike.

3 votes NegativePositive

25 days 8 hours ago...

^ The chances are, the privately owned land on which the house was built was there before the airport. And, as I stated earlier, it was the airport staff`s conscious decision to choose the routes they`ve chosen. Air traffic control is no kidnergarden stuff and if the tech guys were not able to forsee the possibility that people in the houses around the airport and along all flight routes might have some kind of electrical appliances which, no matter how small the probability, might cause interference - it is them who are idiots.

You say "I`m sure there are laws", which implies you do not actually know all those laws and therefore can not cite them. Yet, later in your post, you state that there is nothing in those laws about confiscated items.

Anyway, just so you know, I did not vote you down, because I disagree with you(in fact, I did not vote you down at all), I respect and understand your point of view, I just think it is flawed.

sc1zzen : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

sc1zzen

7 votes NegativePositive

25 days 4 hours ago...

i like pie

Stewie_1873 : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

Stewie_1873

0 votes NegativePositive

25 days 3 hours ago...

I have that brand of aerial on my TV!... but I get a shitty signal with it... and I`m nowhere near an airport...

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009