Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Twin Tower Impact Simulation

Conspiracy theorists say jet fuel fires couldn?t have brought down the towers -- but a simulation of the impact proves otherwise.

  • Views: 3359
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:The Frozen North
  • The Frozen North
  • Richard Louis "Dick" Proenneke (May 4, 1916–April 28, 2. . .
  • Votes 4.7/5 - Views 3936 - Comments 25
  • Video:Impact Gel Dub
  • Impact Gel Dub
  • This is gonna take away the shock from your balls! ..... . .
  • Votes 4.55/5 - Views 4142 - Comments 15
  • Video:JCVD Trailer
  • JCVD Trailer
  • The trailer for Jean Claude Van Damme's new movie, Jcvd. . .
  • Votes 4.01/5 - Views 2035 - Comments 17
  • Video:Dungeon Defender
  • Dungeon Defender
  • An interesting blend of Real Time Strategy, Tower Defen. . .
  • Votes 3.71/5 - Views 3661 - Comments 9
  • Video:WTC 9/11 Lighter
  • WTC 9/11 Lighter
  • I looked for a response to darkangeledge`s question, "N. . .
  • Votes 4.24/5 - Views 3170 - Comments 6

View All



Trouble playing the media? Click here to manually download it.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.55 out of 5 based on 305 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

scuba21 : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

scuba21

0 votes NegativePositive

82 days 1 hour ago...

ummm, I`m not what you would call a conspiracy kinda guy, but just watching the footage of the towers falling, well, it really doesn`t appear that you have a pancake effect, which is what would happen if the vertical support beams failed, which would allow one floor to fall to the next, which isn`t supported by the actual footage. I`m sure some of what he says here is true, but it doesn`t seem to be enough of the story to match of with observed fact.

saltesc : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

saltesc

Hidden (Show Comment) -10 votes

82 days ago...

^ You make me want to reach through the internet and punch you. Punch you fucking hard.

Same goes for anyone who is thinking of saying, "Well that doesn`t explain Tower 7."

NickAngel : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:2007 Winner

NickAngel

10 votes NegativePositive

81 days 23 hours ago...

Ok, it`s done. Now shut up and keep feeding money into the corrupt, broken machine. No? You`re not a patriot? Patriots don`t ask questions.

kingoflight : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

kingoflight

5 votes NegativePositive

81 days 23 hours ago...

I remember a couple of months after the event and the BBC pushed out a program talking about how the beams fire insulation would have been striped and flash burnt away by the fule thats what made the beams weaken and buckle.

Also just to point out can you even see floor to floor when the building is falling .... no there is so much debris in the air you could not even tell if it was pancaking or not.

Onisama : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

Onisama

-6 votes NegativePositive

81 days 21 hours ago...

That theory doesn`t hold otherwise the WTC would`ve fallen sideways and not perfectly isolated like a demolition... but even if the truth comes out. Who`s going to give a fuck and start pointing fingers?

truth-is-the-nemesis : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

truth-is-the-nemesis

12 votes NegativePositive

81 days 20 hours ago...

^
the WTC could not have fallin` sideways in any case -

its rooted 5 sub-basement levels beneath the complex giving it too much anchoring (the forces involved are coming from above & gravity are feeding them downward, so it`s only logical that it would follow the Path of least resistance).

each load-bearing column has a breaking point that cannot be exceeded and getting it to fall like a single structure like a tree just isn`t going to happen.

Red Heaven : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

Red Heaven

14 votes NegativePositive

81 days 17 hours ago...

^^
Onisama

The theory doesn`t hold?

Are YOU an experienced Civil Engineer employed at one of the most prestigious institutions in the US? Purdue sent 22 astronauts to the fuckin` moon.

Everyone wants to think their argument is valid, sitting at a computer in the vastness of their ignorance. Where is your massive computer simulation? Where are your testing facilities? Where are your crack teams of engineers?

Fuck off.

Venomousvole : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

Venomousvole

Hidden (Show Comment) -13 votes

81 days 15 hours ago...

alright, despite the drag race tannoy voiceover. The old guy was quite convincing, still changes nothing. Mom and Pop bin Laden flew home from a visit with bush the day before. Were they doing a last minute check list or swapping apple fucking pie recipies?

phntmlrd69 : LVL 25: VP 3.4: said:

phntmlrd69

4 votes NegativePositive

81 days 9 hours ago...

^I thought bin Laens family disowned him. I could be wrong but I seem to remember hearing that somewhere right after 9/11

Onisama : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

Onisama

-4 votes NegativePositive

80 days 19 hours ago...

^^^ Red, a simulation doesn`t prove a thing. Too many factors could`ve easily been forgotten. E.g. In a court, will a computer simulation prove a murder? No, you need to take all the factors in. ALL OF IT. Which is near impossible btw. The simulation only shows you what COULD`VE happened.

Flaming people won`t change a thing nor acting like a troll and wanting to start a senseless ignorant debate.

Nobody will figure this one out and like the Kennedy case even IF they do, no one will care...

CASE CLOSED since September 11th, 2001.


Bluelight83 : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

Bluelight83

6 votes NegativePositive

79 days ago...

I watched part of this.

Seemed the people explaining what happened offered simulations and fact...the nay sayers offered outrageous theories with no backing.

scuba21 : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

scuba21

-4 votes NegativePositive

79 days ago...

fine, so how do most of you explain unreacted thermite in the ensuing dust found at ground zero?
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19761

Just curious. Cause, this seems to have actual physical evidence, not just a computer simulation. Plus some actual vigorous empirical testing.

anoniem : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

anoniem

6 votes NegativePositive

78 days 23 hours ago...

1st of all, labeling anyone that questions the `official` explanation
as `conspiracy theorists` is mind manipulation.

the phrase `conspiracy theorists` usually always has a negative association with people, and therefore anybody who is labeled as one is automatically associated with being crazy or that they should not be listened to; but really there are people from many different walks of life that disagree with what `really` happened.

and really, this simulation has not `proved` a thing.
it`s just another way of looking at what happened.
be wary of anyone telling you they are 100% sure..

try these on for size if you are one of those weird people that looks at both sides of the argument:

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000
002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8182697
765360042032

http://physics911.net/closerlook

truth-is-the-nemesis : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

truth-is-the-nemesis

1 votes NegativePositive

78 days 23 hours ago...

@ scuba21 :

The unreacted thermite in the ensuing dust found at ground zero-

Answer- this has already been debunked by evidence to the contrary that i have uploaded in the past..look up `Mark Roberts` he answers this and many other truther questions posed by the self-styled movement.

in short the answer is these Nano particles are paint chips found in the aftermath of 9/11 and are combustable as would be expected, however it is not carrying any other unique thermite signature`s E.g. Aluminum Oxide & Barium Nitrate.

Okonomiyaki3000 : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

Okonomiyaki3000

4 votes NegativePositive

78 days 23 hours ago...

Thoze grafx r tite, yo. Is this for PS3 or XBox?

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009