Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Smoking Banned In Homes

In Belmont, Calif. it is now illegal to smoke in your own home and, as John Blackstone reports, the new law has angered one woman who’s now on a mission.

  • Doqaz
  • posted by Doqaz
  • Date 7/20/2009 7:46:16 AM
  • Views: 10837
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Tags Tags: smoking banned

Related Media

  • Video:Smoke Break
  • Smoke Break
  • Might as well since he is not going anywhere soon.
  • Votes 4.61/5 - Views 2202 - Comments 2
  • Video:Smoking PSA
  • Smoking PSA
  • Could this guy be cool without his cigarette?
  • Votes 4.49/5 - Views 2965 - Comments 7
  • Video:Banned PETA Ad
  • Banned PETA Ad
  • PETA ad banned by NBC for this Super Bowl.
  • Votes 3.61/5 - Views 4353 - Comments 37

View All



Trouble playing the media? Click here to manually download it.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

4.49 out of 5 based on 489 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

udvox : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

udvox

36 votes NegativePositive

125 days 3 hours ago...

I agree with the city. The law applies only to apartment buildings. I don`t want to be sitting at home smelling some fucker`s 2-pack a day habit.

Dusma : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

Dusma

21 votes NegativePositive

125 days 3 hours ago...

i agree with her personally, but i understand the city`s argument. The only flaw in her logic is that she says there is something in the constitution to guarantee her happiness or something.. that`s wrong she has the right to PURSUE her happiness. That doesn`t guarantee it.

I`m a smoker and yes I`m irritated that nonsmokers think they are better than us and are trying to take our rights away. But in restaurants and such I can understand so I don`t complain. Bars on the other hand piss me off.If you go to the bar you should expect smoke and alcohol.

Besides what right does the government have to dictate business policy to a privately owned business. (refering more to the mom and pop places several have closed around here due to the smoking ban b.s.)

Crimson Wave : LVL 43: VP 5: said:

Crimson Wave

49 votes NegativePositive

125 days 2 hours ago...

"Officers can come knocking"

What a waste of time and money.

Vizreel : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

Vizreel

Hidden (Show Comment) -26 votes

125 days 2 hours ago...

Hasn`t "second-had smoking" been disproved over and over? Other than the smell, there are no harmful consequences to it.

scuba21 : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

scuba21

8 votes NegativePositive

125 days 1 hour ago...

you would think something like that would be left up to the building owner. Most buildings I know are smoke free simply due to the amount of smoke damage that occurs from smoking in an apartment suite. Plus, a non smoker wouldn`t want to rent an apartment that smells like cigarettes, would they now. But if a building owner wanted to have a smokers area, or set of suites, that should be up to them, provided they can isolate the smell from the rest of the tenants.

Randomosity : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

Randomosity

18 votes NegativePositive

125 days 1 hour ago...

Vizreel:
Are you nuts? The smoke coming off the end of a cigarette is the same smoke being inhaled by the smoker, and containes all the harmful compounds inherant to tobacco smoke. Granted, the smoke exhaled by the smoker is marginally less hermful, as some of the chemicals have been absorbed by the smokers` lungs, but `second hand smoke` isn`t limited to exaled smoke.
How many children, (including my own, I`m ashamed to say) have developed respiratory diffulties as a direct result of being exposed to cigarette smoke?

Tada : LVL 44: VP 5: said:

Tada

19 votes NegativePositive

125 days 1 hour ago...

Vizreel: Second hand smoking is a very real thing. Sure it`s not as bad as actually smoking and the negative effects can take decades to actually show(just like with normal smoking), but if you`re near a people who are smoking you`re going to get particles of tar and various kinds of carcinogens into your lungs.

HOWEVER.

Since I`ve yet to see smoke which can pass through solid walls, this law is pretty pointless. Unless you keep a steady tobacco fire up all the time in your apartment, smoking inside your apartment will not effect the other apartents.

Nirah : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

Nirah

6 votes NegativePositive

125 days ago...

In a way it`s okay to ban smoking in appartments, as long as it doesn`t go into private homes, but they didn`t have to make it a law...

The rule should be at the land owner, not the city!

Here in Denmark some new appartments have made non smoking rules, which is sufficient.

fatninja : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

fatninja

17 votes NegativePositive

125 days ago...

Police state! First its cigs then itll be anything.

Flynn_2006 : LVL 46: VP 5: said:

Flynn_2006

11 votes NegativePositive

124 days 23 hours ago...

Landlords can choose tenants, tenants can choose apartment according to its conditions. If the law starts to give executive power on one side over virtue and not punish serious disturbance, it would always favour the complainers. Say what if my neighbour is too fat and make me look bad whenever he goes out the door. Should I have absolute power to make him go to the gym? No? but it`s good for him.

Praetorian : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

Praetorian

15 votes NegativePositive

124 days 18 hours ago...

Pansies destroying society with delusions of self entitlement.

Stop fucking whining, its her home, she should be able to do anything legal that she wants.

sato : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

sato

5 votes NegativePositive

124 days 17 hours ago...

i think the real tragedy here is that people need to be forced to respect their neighbours and others.
"overwhelming evidence shows that second-hand smoking is dangerous", then "this idea that i am killing other people is ridiculous, prove it". i think this shows the lack of a thought process a lot of people have these days, the `i say it`s ridiculous therefore there is no evidence, overwhelming or otherwise`. reminds me of the bible bangers with their `the bible has never been proven wrong` bs.

on the core issue though personally i think someone`s right to smoke shouldn`t be infringed, and neither should someone`s right to breathe fresh air. if some kind of field which stops smoke moving from smokers to where non-smokers are was invented it would be great, but until then unfortunately laws like this are necessary to protect people`s rights.

^^ "delusions of self-entitlement"? err would that be the same entitlement you are saying that people have to smoke inside?

bidman : LVL 23: VP 3.2: said:

bidman

14 votes NegativePositive

124 days 17 hours ago...

First the real tragedy is people using science here and there, with bogus claims, just to prove their point.

There is scientific evidence that suggests second hand smoke might be harmfull, and rightefully so. But its far from beeing overwhelming, in fact its closer to thin than overwhelming.

Overwhelming, yeah only in Cali.
California, land of the biased new aged self-indulgent fascits. Fucking PETA loving I`m so righteous mofos telling the world what to do. Too fucking busy looking at themselves to notice evrything is falling apart. California has become a neo-liberal right leaning state worst than neo-cons could ever dream of. Politicall correctness and nothing but....

Fuck that lady should be allowed to smoke in her house, if she does it too much and that it ruins other people`s life, have the building manager take care of it. But passing laws.... to tell people how to live inside their houses... fuck that shit.

Anyone that doesnt see whats wrong with this is a fucking pussy.

Sorry people, dont hide behind BS scientific arguments to pass fascist laws. RIDICULOUS.

ohh yeah, I`m a non smoker by the way. And 10 bucks that lady is an ex-smoker.

Lets have a law forbidding obese people to run for election because they are bad role models for the youth.

Praetorian : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

Praetorian

2 votes NegativePositive

124 days 16 hours ago...

Sato, if you think smoke is going to leave your apartment, creep down the hallway, sneak in under the door and jump into your neighbor`s lungs, you`re an idiot and a significance junkie.

This is just something else for unimportant people to whine about, its retarded. There is not going to be any significant second hand smoke from another fucking apartment.

WTF has happened to people since "The Greatest Generation"? Jesus, everything is pansified so whiny fucking liberals can accomplish something.

Weak babies, smoking is not illegal.

Csmack : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

Csmack

2 votes NegativePositive

124 days 16 hours ago...

Blasting loud music is more of a nuisance to neighbors than smoking a cigarette. Yet the cops will come if you smoke in the privacy of your own home?

Good job California. Just what we need: more government in our lives.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009