Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Dawkins vs. Tyson

At the 'Beyond Belief' discussion, Tyson rebukes Dawkins for his rhetorical style, and Dawkins responds

  • Views: 3213
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Tags Tags: dawkins vs. tyson

Related Media

View All



Trouble playing the media? Click here to manually download it.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

4.64 out of 5 based on 571 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

bikephene : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

bikephene

21 votes NegativePositive

257 days 4 hours ago...

Wow that seemed much more civil than what I thought I was about to click on.

erico : LVL 40: VP 4.8: said:

erico

7 votes NegativePositive

257 days 4 hours ago...

i feel like i`v seen this before.

audrey : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

audrey

14 votes NegativePositive

256 days 22 hours ago...

i also feel like i`ve seen this before,
but that doesn`t matter,
cause its dawkins! and its brilliant!

its like the logo of don ham:
is don, is good,

is dawkins, is good

:)

sato : LVL 27: VP 3.6: said:

sato

-1 votes NegativePositive

255 days 1 hour ago...

heh took forever for that guy to spit out what he was trying to say, i was starting to get irritated.

^^do u mean it seems familiar? people who `feel` their facts r usually religious nuts...

MARINE255 : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

MARINE255

4 votes NegativePositive

254 days 20 hours ago...

^ yeah I was waiting for the words "energy" or "aura" to come up

chalky23 : LVL 25: VP 3.4: said:

chalky23

2 votes NegativePositive

254 days 16 hours ago...

Loved Dawkins response.

ShinyG : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

ShinyG

15 votes NegativePositive

254 days 15 hours ago...

Dawkins gave a very funny answer, but unfortunately he didn`t answer Tyson`s critic, he just quoted somebody else using the same "motto".
I feel that Tyson is somewhat right to criticize Dawkins "I`m right, if you don`t agree, you`re an idiot" attitude as it serves no educational purpose whatsoever. More than that, it`s one of the "weapons" used by religion/cult leaders since the early days of mankind: "I`m right, if you don`t agree, you`ll die/burn in hell/other generic tormenting punishment". He`s one of the most brilliant minds of our times so I think he should bring him self down to the level of a cult/religious leader with that.
Anyway, funny answer nonetheless!

scsuh : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

scsuh

15 votes NegativePositive

254 days 15 hours ago...

dawkin`s response pretty much proved tyson`s point.

edthegr8 : LVL 7: VP 1.6: said:

edthegr8

10 votes NegativePositive

254 days 14 hours ago...

ohhhh that tyson

napalm4sd : LVL 26: VP 3.5: said:

napalm4sd

-1 votes NegativePositive

254 days 13 hours ago...

How in the fuck did that answer any of tysons questions?

Gimli000 : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

Gimli000

3 votes NegativePositive

254 days 13 hours ago...

I think the debate has room for both styles of rhetoric. But I also feel Tyson has a valid point.

Sabbs : LVL 21: VP 3: said:

Sabbs

-5 votes NegativePositive

254 days 12 hours ago...

"How in the fuck did that answer any of tysons questions? "


its a typical response by someone who has nothing to say or knows that he cant answer the question.. they reword everything and talking in "lawyer english"

"idiots and morons" (which a majority of the people are on this site) bite down on every fricken worm and even if they have no idea what he just said agree with it..

thats where the world is headed these days.. believe everything you read and see on tv.. wheee

martinimix : LVL 24: VP 3.3: said:

martinimix

1 votes NegativePositive

254 days 10 hours ago...

It didn`t answer the question because the video limited the response. If we had the chance to watch the entire segment between Tyson and Dawkins, we would then have a better perspective on this rebuke.

PokeyGorilla : LVL 23: VP 3.2: said:

PokeyGorilla

Hidden (Show Comment) -9 votes

254 days 10 hours ago...

Evolution is a lie

ReX : LVL 22: VP 3.1: said:

ReX

1 votes NegativePositive

254 days 10 hours ago...

If being honest about the likelyhood of gods is too offensive; watch some John Stewart and whatnot. If you`re beyond the accidental touchy subject, and you`re intrested and learning about it: Then JUST PRESENT THE FACTS. Don`t ease into it and try to frame it in some sort of monotheistic, keeping to archaic beliefs etc. Just keep it simple, present the facts, explain the theory that binds them together.
It`s not as if he`s saying, everybody else is wrong and can never be right in any possible way. He`s saying: This is by far the most likely, scientifically supported conclusion to be drawn. And if you have something to add that`s unlikely, historically accepted and dogmatic belief; go elsewhere.
Your claims have been adressed, either adress facts in a scientific manner or have remove yourself once again from the debate format and veil thyself in ignorance (eg. Fuck off).

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009