Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Who's More Pro-Science, Republicans or D...

Neil deGrasse Tyson defends government support for U.S. science research under President George W. Bush, and says that, contrary to popular belief, "funding for science under Republican administrations has been historically higher than under Democrats

  • Views: 1919
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Rape-Nuts
  • Rape-Nuts
  • Al Franken proposes getting rid of the old "it's OK if . . .
  • Votes 4.47/5 - Views 1431 - Comments 11
  • Video:Run Forest!
  • Run Forest!
  • Great clip from a great movie.
  • Votes 4.25/5 - Views 3268 - Comments 11

View All



Trouble playing the media? Click here to manually download it.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.41 out of 5 based on 45 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

3 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

LeighCedar : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

LeighCedar

2 votes NegativePositive

262 days 17 hours ago...

I like listening to Neil speak, he`s always so excited.

However, were people really saying (besides the questioner) that they thought Democrats were higher spenders on science?

I`ve heard lots of complaints on where the money does and doesn`t go, but never a "Republicans spend less" argument.

GB! : LVL 65: VP 5: said:

GB!

3 votes NegativePositive

262 days 6 hours ago...

^ Indeed. how much is not the issue. where does the money go is more important.

Also, bush admin. censored scientific research.

most scientists are glad bush is gone and so am I!!!

Stretch2000mm : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

Stretch2000mm

1 votes NegativePositive

258 days 14 hours ago...

Science of war, conquest, and profit maybe.

Not pure science.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009