Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Richard Dawkins Debates Alister Mcgrath

This is an interview cut from a Dawkins documentary. Very good stuff. Has real debate not muddled by fundamentalist nonesense or dogmatic twaddle. Enjoy.

  • exploder
  • posted by exploder
  • Date 8/31/2008 4:28:21 AM
  • Views: 4548
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Donnie Darko Sequel
  • Donnie Darko Sequel
  • Teaser poster to S. Darko, the rumored sequel to Donnie. . .
  • Votes 4.64/5 - Views 351 - Comments 7

View All



Trouble playing the media? Click here to manually download it.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

4.6 out of 5 based on 422 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

XSR : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

XSR

23 votes NegativePositive

97 days 8 hours ago...

Wow! Two smart people! In the very same room!

TrinitySoul : LVL 11: VP 2: said:

TrinitySoul

12 votes NegativePositive

97 days 4 hours ago...

Who actaully finish watching the video...

*I didn`t and I`m ashamed =(

MysticMan : LVL 21: VP 3: said:

MysticMan

Hidden (Show Comment) -28 votes

97 days 3 hours ago...

Dick has problems having a dialog with creationists. Having 2 strong minded people having apposing beleifs will not bring a civalised discussion. He blames creationists for not having a good dialog, and creationists i reacon would blame him. They are both at fault because they both are strong minded and have uni-directional though.

I think alot of the problem with his "dialog" with creationists was dicks interpretation of the word faith, and it is good he notices that.

What proper way should evidence be used?

It is good to see that dick says he is not 100% certain about evolution. You will still get people who say they are 100% certain about god or evolution.

Very good clip.

lukassvec : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

lukassvec

12 votes NegativePositive

97 days 2 hours ago...

Brilliant. I`m so happy to hear a proper discussion on religion by Dawkins. The debates with Hitchens and Harris are good as well. Thanks.

^Sure "two strong minded individuals with opposing beliefs" can have a civilized discussion. This was one of them. And what does "uni-directional thought" mean? Neither tried to change the beliefs of the other. Rather they tried to illuminate the differences and see if there were contradictions or fallacies. And Dawkins has always said he is not 100% sure of evolution- just that it is a theory with overwhelming factual support. No reasonable person is 100% sure of a scientific theory or fact.

edit- If uni-directional thought means arguing with one idea, then Dawkins nor Mcgarth did that. They went through many different arguments and ideas centering around their respective theses. That`s what a proper discussion is. Oh, and thanks MysticMan for the personal attack. Nothing like childish banter to belittle a conversation.

rybear4513 : LVL 26: VP 3.5: said:

rybear4513

Hidden (Show Comment) -22 votes

96 days 20 hours ago...

i pray for all you sinners

MysticMan : LVL 22: VP 3.1: said:

MysticMan

Hidden (Show Comment) -19 votes

96 days 19 hours ago...

"And Dawkins has always said he is not 100% sure in evolution- just that it is a theory with overwhelming factual support"

Then it would not be theory then it would be fact. Why would he push evolution as fact if he is not 100% sure?

"And what does "uni-directional thought" mean?"

Uni- means having or consisting of one, so one directional though. If you dont know what one directional thought is, you should not be on here, you should be at school.

LeighCedar : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

LeighCedar

7 votes NegativePositive

96 days 15 hours ago...

Incredibly interesting, both for the discussion, and for the little unedited bits.

Great to see two people on opposite sides being so high minded

psychologyprofessor : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

psychologyprofessor

5 votes NegativePositive

96 days 14 hours ago...

Three cheers for Dawkins

Hip! Hip!...

phmud : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

phmud

15 votes NegativePositive

96 days 10 hours ago...

Is that guys neck broken or what?

Alpha Raptor : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

Alpha Raptor

9 votes NegativePositive

93 days 21 hours ago...

i found my head slowly tilting to the left while watching alitater talk, oddly enough i woke up this morning with a cramp that this video did soothe

Arcturus519 : LVL 53: VP 5: said:

Arcturus519

1 votes NegativePositive

93 days 6 hours ago...

wow Alister Mcgrath is a blithering idiot.

Well spoken, but a blithering idiot.

Presto : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

Presto

12 votes NegativePositive

93 days 1 hour ago...

@ rybear4513

As my Grandma says:

Pray in one hand and shit in the other and see which fills up 1st.

$!NN3R666 : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

$!NN3R666

4 votes NegativePositive

93 days ago...

@rybear4513
Don`t pray for me it burns.

ricemonkey : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

ricemonkey

12 votes NegativePositive

92 days 23 hours ago...

Seems like McGrath wants to argue that religion is USEFUL and HELPFUL. he never wants to address whether or not it`s true or not....

but if more christians were like this it wouldn`t be so bad...
D:

Paragon : LVL 25: VP 3.4: said:

Paragon

16 votes NegativePositive

92 days 23 hours ago...

"i pray for all you sinners"

Thank you. In return I`ll think for you.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Moderators Contest
Prize
Entry Dates: 11/4/2008-12/15/2008