Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

WTC 9/11 Second Hit - Rare Video

This will stop all the conspiracies saying it wasn't a plane that hit the second time. I believe this clip is from a CBC documentary about Dick Cheney.

  • Scienott
  • posted by Scienott
  • Date 6/21/2005 12:00:00 AM
  • Views: 99384
  • Teen
  • Teen
  • Violence, Offensive

Tags Tags: second

Related Media

  • Video:Second Notice
  • Second Notice
  • A taxpayer received a strongly worded "second notice" t. . .
  • Votes 2.25/5 - Views 63 - Comments 0
  • Video:Golf Course
  • Golf Course
  • First golfer, Bill: "What was your score?" Bob: "Sev. . .
  • Votes 4.01/5 - Views 574 - Comments 0
  • Video:Watch the World(s)
  • Watch the World(s)
  • Van Gogh's Starry Night re-created in Second Life. Cre. . .
  • Votes 3.88/5 - Views 765 - Comments 5
  • Video:$50 a Second
  • $50 a Second
  • A woman was just getting out of the shower when the doo. . .
  • Votes 3.97/5 - Views 146 - Comments 0
  • Video:Bad News
  • Bad News
  • The second worst news.
  • Votes 4.66/5 - Views 4309 - Comments 5

View All

Your Macromedia's Flash Player
may be out of date


Click here to upgrade your flash player.

You may also get this message if you have disabled your javascript. You must enable it to view videos.



Trouble playing the video? Click here to download the original.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.7 out of 5 based on 49 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

Pork : LVL 17: VP 2.6: said:

Pork

-2 votes NegativePositive

1371 days 17 hours ago...

Ow. That sure is a plane..

nakedlunch : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

nakedlunch

2 votes NegativePositive

1371 days 15 hours ago...

I dont recall anyone disputing the fact that the second tower was also hit by a plane duffus, whats more in question is what brought down the towers.

Jash : LVL 5: VP 1.4: said:

Jash

-4 votes NegativePositive

1371 days 13 hours ago...

yeah who said it wasnt a plane?

tomyboy : LVL 3: VP 1.2: said:

tomyboy

1 votes NegativePositive

1371 days 11 hours ago...

i remeber watching the second plane hit the tower live. when it happend that morning. were people really saying that it was fake? and dont they remeber for the next couple months how many times the videos were replayed and from all the different angles?

toz66 : LVL 7: VP 1.6: said:

toz66

5 votes NegativePositive

1371 days 11 hours ago...

the theory guys was brought up by many big conspriricey therorists, saying that both planes were not comercial,that they were remotes, and had no markings or windows.

as an answer to that and this movie, it doesnt prove if it was a real plane, if you get my drift.

i have seen a great documentary (cant remeber name lol), were it showed the 2nd plane and i got to say was very weird looking.

but my final answer to anybody who belives the no plane theory....what happned to the real ones that did take off......you cant make 4 planes disappear at the same time, especially with that many experts no doubt studying there radar screens a bit more carefully than usuall...wouldnt you say.

chinchillah : LVL 25: VP 3.4: said:

chinchillah

2 votes NegativePositive

1371 days 10 hours ago...

this footage isn't rare or anything special, the've shown it many times on tv following the attack.

If you want a REALLY good footage of what it was like, watch a documentary called 9|11 by Jules and Gedeon Naudet. It's about two french brothers filming a normal documentary about the life with the NY Fire Department...then it all happens. You get to see tons footage from inside the twin towers, the chaos, and when the buildings fall. It's a great watch, and it shows what they people went through. You basically get to live through it on your television.

And whoever said that it was not a commercial jet that crashed into the 2nd tower obviously wasn't in New York when it happened.

UrbanDin : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

UrbanDin

3 votes NegativePositive

1371 days 6 hours ago...

I believe the controversy you are speaking of was the pentagon hit. There was supposedly no wreckage no eyewitnessess and only a 60-65 ft hole where the "plane" hit. A 757 has a wingspan of 124 ft. 10inches. It's maximum fuel capacity is 11,489 gallons carried in the wing and fuselage sections of the plane. No wreckage? The grass is not even charred.
http://www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/report.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm

Sangre Viento : LVL 5: VP 1.4: said:

Sangre Viento

0 votes NegativePositive

1370 days 13 hours ago...

There are so many videos of the second plane hitting, I assume you are reffering to the fact that there is a small explosion seen that seems to be right before the second plane hits and some people think it was a missile. Who said that there wasn't a second plane crash? Nakedlunch is definately right...

nakedlunch : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

nakedlunch

1 votes NegativePositive

1370 days 11 hours ago...

All in all its still amazing of ALL the video footage from numerous sources on the wtc and pentagon hits, the only footage ever realesed to date is still the same crap we saw on day one, I just wanna know what the hold up on that is? its not like its a national secret ( here comes the conspiracy) unless!! there hidings something in the footage,and what about the guiness book of records pulled off by NSA saying that all 8 yes 8 black boxes ( 2 per plane) were miraculously destroyed.

Johiden : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

Johiden

-2 votes NegativePositive

1370 days 9 hours ago...

Hmmm, it's like the camera guy knew the plane was going to hit...

StillBlaziN : LVL 21: VP 3: said:

StillBlaziN

-3 votes NegativePositive

1369 days 21 hours ago...

I like the explosion and the destruction...

i wish the people didnt die though..

that was cool

bokkey : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

bokkey

1 votes NegativePositive

1369 days 2 hours ago...

Interesting how this video footage doesnt show the weird, mysterious "flash" of light like the other footages do.

I watched a video documentary on the debate of how building 7 was "pulled", while the media said it collapsed due to damage. Also in the doco, they pulled some evidence on Bush's brothers contracts which showed that he made some huge dollar deal with a sharer's company from the WTC. His contract ended on sept 11th 2001, which showed that he played some part in the attacks, yes, bush's brother! I find it a bit sus how Bush didnt react to the attacks while sitting in a classroom with lil kids when he was first informed. it was all just a big lousy set up to destroy the towers so his brother didnt have to pay off debts he owed (worth over $2 million) to those companies.

On another note, there was an interesting doco on TV showing evidence that the pentagon was NOT hit by a plane but by some sort of missile. It raised a very good question; "29 cameras are mounted on the pentagon and are guarding the area 24 hrs, 7 days a week, since ofcourse it is the 2nd most important building in the U.S, so how come not one of the cameras footage was shown on TV to show what actually hit the pentagon??" a mystery that is covered up by the government which will probably never be solved. Its all a set up.

i tell u, 9/11 was an INSIDE job, the arabs are not that rich, marked out, skillful, and licenced to steal a military jet from a RAAF base, mount a missile onto it, control it swiftlessly and crash it into the WTC.

bokkey : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

bokkey

1 votes NegativePositive

1369 days 2 hours ago...

Interesting how this video footage doesnt show the weird, mysterious "flash" of light like the other footages do.

I watched a video documentary on the debate of how building 7 was "pulled", while the media said it collapsed due to damage. Also in the doco, they pulled some evidence on Bush's brothers contracts which showed that he made some huge dollar deal with a sharer's company from the WTC. His contract ended on sept 11th 2001, which showed that he played some part in the attacks, yes, bush's brother! I find it a bit sus how Bush didnt react to the attacks while sitting in a classroom with lil kids when he was first informed. it was all just a big lousy set up to destroy the towers so his brother didnt have to pay off debts he owed (worth over $2 million) to those companies.

On another note, there was an interesting doco on TV showing evidence that the pentagon was NOT hit by a plane but by some sort of missile. It raised a very good question; "29 cameras are mounted on the pentagon and are guarding the area 24 hrs, 7 days a week, since ofcourse it is the 2nd most important building in the U.S, so how come not one of the cameras footage was shown on TV to show what actually hit the pentagon??" a mystery that is covered up by the government which will probably never be solved. Its all a set up.

i tell u, 9/11 was an INSIDE job, the arabs are not that rich, marked out, skillful, and licenced to steal a military jet from a RAAF base, mount a missile onto it, control it swiftlessly and crash it into the WTC.

bokkey : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

bokkey

2 votes NegativePositive

1369 days 1 hour ago...

Interesting how this video footage doesnt show the weird, mysterious "flash" of light like the other footages do.

I watched a video documentary on the debate of how building 7 was "pulled", while the media said it collapsed due to damage. Also in the doco, they pulled some evidence on Bush's brothers contracts which showed that he made some huge dollar deal with a sharer's company from the WTC. His contract ended on sept 11th 2001, which showed that he played some part in the attacks, yes, bush's brother! I find it a bit sus how Bush didnt react to the attacks while sitting in a classroom with lil kids when he was first informed. it was all just a big lousy set up to destroy the towers so his brother didnt have to pay off debts he owed (worth over $2 million) to those companies.

On another note, there was an interesting doco on TV showing evidence that the pentagon was NOT hit by a plane but by some sort of missile. It raised a very good question; "29 cameras are mounted on the pentagon and are guarding the area 24 hrs, 7 days a week, since ofcourse it is the 2nd most important building in the U.S, so how come not one of the cameras footage was shown on TV to show what actually hit the pentagon??" a mystery that is covered up by the government which will probably never be solved. Its all a set up.

i tell u, 9/11 was an INSIDE job, the arabs are not that rich, marked out, skillful, and licenced to steal a military jet from a RAAF base, mount a missile onto it, control it swiftlessly and crash it into the WTC.

avidplayer : LVL 8: VP 1.7: said:

avidplayer

0 votes NegativePositive

1368 days 8 hours ago...

You tell them bokkey!

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009