Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Molten Steel Pours Out of the South WTC ...

Small fires don`t melt steel. This is not aluminum. Aluminum would be silverish at that temperature. It always baffled me that people won`t get it through their skulls that those fires were not hot enough to destroy the infrastructure of a modern steel building.

  • Batman!
  • posted by Batman!
  • Date 1/20/2008 12:55:46 PM
  • Views: 6294
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Don't be Revolting
  • Don't be Revolting
  • I don't know what it is about this clip from Blackadder. . .
  • Votes 4.5/5 - Views 1771 - Comments 11
  • Video:The 911 Hoax
  • The 911 Hoax
  • So will we let them get away with this?
  • Votes 3.09/5 - Views 3158 - Comments 47
  • Video:The World
  • The World
  • According to Street Fighter
  • Votes 4.35/5 - Views 2372 - Comments 7
  • Video:Bush Had It Easy
  • Bush Had It Easy
  • Both prolly raised as public figureheads anyway.
  • Votes 4.28/5 - Views 2725 - Comments 6
  • Video:Battle Of Britain
  • Battle Of Britain
  • A tribute to the pilots that flew in the skies in the B. . .
  • Votes 4.59/5 - Views 1950 - Comments 14

View All

Your Macromedia's Flash Player
may be out of date


Click here to upgrade your flash player.

You may also get this message if you have disabled your javascript. You must enable it to view videos.



Trouble playing the video? Click here to download the original.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.17 out of 5 based on 648 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

Batman! : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

Batman!

21 votes NegativePositive

658 days 11 hours ago...

Why are we not rioting in the streets...

Victorio : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

Victorio

21 votes NegativePositive

658 days 10 hours ago...

Because they beat, pepper spray, fire hose, sonic blast, sand bag, rubber bullet and truncheon you as soon as you do. Same here in Canada, or at least it is more than half way there.

:/

fryser_d : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

fryser_d

12 votes NegativePositive

658 days 10 hours ago...

^True, but you will agree that we don`t have the same culture of blindness here. One of the worst scandale that happen here, was the "sponsorship scandal" and the government was overthrone.

But that`s childsplay compare of what scandals happen every months over there...

1/4 of them are actually publish in the mainstream medias... And they have a complete army of fuckers to make it past as the same level as the weather.

SantaAndFriends : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

SantaAndFriends

18 votes NegativePositive

658 days 10 hours ago...

Batman there is a simple explanation for the sparks seen in the video.

The building did not collapse because the steel melted, the building collapsed merely because it was heated to a point in which it began to soften, (Not Melt) and as the metal expanded the weight of the floors above it caused it to buckle.and as the steel buckled the floors above fell inwards taking down the building. The material seen coming out the side, although not identifiable, is definitely not "molten steel" if you study the video closely you can see small chunks of the material being blown by the wind, while you can also see large chunks blown by the wind. The material is definitely not steel.

fryser_d : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

fryser_d

6 votes NegativePositive

658 days 9 hours ago...

^What does it have to do with the melted steel?

And pools of melted steel found weeks after 911?

Try at least to confront same stuff.

TriMeFoo : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

TriMeFoo

Hidden (Show Comment) -12 votes

658 days 9 hours ago...

It`s thermite pouring out. They used thurmite to cut the core columns. Notice it`s triggered right before the building collapses... If the building had pancaked as Santa is trying to explain there would have been floors stacked on floors at the bottom and they probably would have started to fall off to the side away from the point of most resistance but there is absolutely no way that it would pulverize the core columns the entire way down the building because the entire building was not on fire.

CookieMonster : LVL 23: VP 3.2: said:

CookieMonster

Hidden (Show Comment) -10 votes

658 days 8 hours ago...

once the chopper left they triggered the explosives. that was no news chopper.

MasterLuna : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

MasterLuna

2 votes NegativePositive

658 days 7 hours ago...

@santaandfriends, the towers were built in 3 stacks like 3 blocks on top of each other. both planes hit the top stack of the towers, the bottom 2 could have supported the top part of the tower falling down. the towers were also built in a web form which have a central core and starts branching out which it pretty strong. taller building have had worse fires than this one and have not fallen. as an architect i am stilled confused to what went wrong here. i personally think the buildings were imploded becuase when they fell everything seemed to go inwards instead of to the sides

may also those victim rest in peace

@thetruthisnemesis..... they knew about the attack and didnt do nothing about it, they got all the warnings and ignored them

truth-is-the-nemesis : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

truth-is-the-nemesis

20 votes NegativePositive

658 days 6 hours ago...

So-

the US government rigged the WTC building`s with thermite & explosives in order to destroy them and start a war.

And they did so by flying remotely piloted boeing 747`s into each building - and they knew EXACTLY between which floors to avoid hitting in order to not prematurely set-off either the thermite or explosives? MAKES ALOTTA SENSE?.

conspiracy theorist`s always conviently forget or overlook some of the more outlandish claims (e.g. the plane wasn`t real, or that it had a missile beneath it) earlier spouted as true in favour of slightly more plausible, but equally ridiculous one`s to further there own opinions, not facts.

before you vote me down or challenge my beliefs in this matter first check this site - http://www.911myths.com/

it debunks claims mentioned here by the theorists.

nova1999 : LVL 44: VP 5: said:

nova1999

0 votes NegativePositive

658 days 6 hours ago...

^^You can`t convince these morons who still believe it was a set-up. TriMeFoo for example believes that it is possible to make a machine that gives out more energy than is put in. This is not the only retarded theory these people believe in.

The problem is they do not have a critical thought process. They use evidence like the fact the collapse didn`t look right to them.

Ecnav : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

Ecnav

-3 votes NegativePositive

658 days 5 hours ago...

nova1999, that device that puts out more energy than is put in is called a coil :)

Fusion power is possible, just too costly.

boldfart : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

boldfart

13 votes NegativePositive

658 days 4 hours ago...

Thermite is not practical for cutting vertical beams, C4 does the job neatly and would not be seen from ground level.

Alpha Raptor : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

Alpha Raptor

9 votes NegativePositive

658 days 2 hours ago...

aluminum does indeed glow due to black body radiation.
reference, http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/glowing.html with pretty pictures for those who have trouble with words.

gardendaleguy : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

gardendaleguy

10 votes NegativePositive

658 days ago...

doesnt the US make money from war?

TriMeFoo : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

TriMeFoo

14 votes NegativePositive

657 days 23 hours ago...

No truth I`m not saying that all of the claims about 9/11 are true. Some of it is going to be wrong since they very little evidence to go on as all but 200 some pieces from both of those buildings has been shipped out of the country and destroyed. In contrast to what happened with flight TWA 800 where we scoured the bottom of the sea so that we could perform a complete reconstruction to find out what had gone wrong, the opposite was done here. Only $600,000 were spent investigating 9/11 versus 40,000,000 spent to investigate Clinton.

The site you suggested is complete crap. under the section of demolition it attempts to show that a building pancake can happen by showing other buildings that have pancaked because inefficient building materials were used, design, or gas tank explosions. It does not even attempt to explain how an oxygen starved fire can weaken steel. Weidlinger & Associates did a study debunking the pancake theory and the National Institute of Standards and Technology also rejected the pancake theory.

The section on the pentagon addresses a claim that I`ve never even heard before coming to that site about a drill at the pentagon involving a plane crash instead of explaining how a 747 fits into a 16x16 foot hole and how titanium is vaporized by the explosion. Or why it would be a security risk for them to release a video of the actual plane hitting the building, instead of the bullshit they`ve let out so far.

We can debate what did or didn`t happen on 9/11 all day but ultimately we`re not going to be able to prove shit because near all the evidence has been destroyed. What we can agree on is that the 9/11 truth movement is a joke and serves as another distraction from the issue`s we should be up in arms about like the rigged voting system or the suspension of habeas corpus, or the presidents right to declare a police state, legalized torture, and one of the biggest in my opinion is that even if Americans tried to boycott at this point in time it would not matter any more because the U.S dollar is in decline and all the real money is being made from exporting goods now so they no longer really need our consumption anyways.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009