Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

"Seven is Exploding"

In April 2007, Italian TV broadcasted a definite proof that Building 7 was demolished by explosives. For the rest of the series, go to luogocomune.net

  • Views: 4515
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Bush Had It Easy
  • Bush Had It Easy
  • Both prolly raised as public figureheads anyway.
  • Votes 4.28/5 - Views 2726 - Comments 6
  • Video:Asbestos
  • Asbestos
  • Your life depends on it
  • Votes 4.47/5 - Views 4118 - Comments 17
  • Video:WTC 9/11 Lighter
  • WTC 9/11 Lighter
  • I looked for a response to darkangeledge`s question, "N. . .
  • Votes 4.25/5 - Views 3162 - Comments 6

View All

Your Macromedia's Flash Player
may be out of date


Click here to upgrade your flash player.

You may also get this message if you have disabled your javascript. You must enable it to view videos.



Trouble playing the video? Click here to download the original.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.36 out of 5 based on 43 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

clericgram : LVL 13: VP 2.2: said:

clericgram

Hidden (Show Comment) -10 votes

695 days 19 hours ago...

Get in line people

clericgram : LVL 13: VP 2.2: said:

clericgram

9 votes NegativePositive

695 days 19 hours ago...

The most compelling piece of evidence.Anyone questions you show them this.A definite must see!!

2ndhandsmoker : LVL 43: VP 5: said:

2ndhandsmoker

-4 votes NegativePositive

695 days 18 hours ago...

what language was that? well fuck yeah for them finding the truth i guess...

exploder : LVL 46: VP 5: said:

exploder

19 votes NegativePositive

695 days 17 hours ago...

Thanks for the excellent post. I wish more people would wake up to the FACT that there are some serious and hard questions left to be answered. This clip is one of the most factual and direct demonstrations of why that is so.

I, nor most anyone else, can possibly claim to know what shit went down on Sept 11, but we know two things for sure:

1. What the US government says is filthy fucking lies.

2. We NEED to have the truth. There are probably some executions in order for treason and murder. Hopefully public ones.

Woosh : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

Woosh

Hidden (Show Comment) -20 votes

695 days 17 hours ago...

InsayneJayne did 9/11...

...then she had a cigarette afterwards.

WAKEupB4its2L8 : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

WAKEupB4its2L8

Hidden (Show Comment) -14 votes

695 days 14 hours ago...

Great post. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/psyopnews1.htm

NYCJockCub : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

NYCJockCub

17 votes NegativePositive

695 days 9 hours ago...

While I encourage people to continue questioning this, the people (like me) who live in this neighborhood always find the Building 7 controversy to be the most baffling.

- Building 7 has (and, in the reconstructed building, has) the electrical substation that provides electricty to my condo (Liberty st./South End Ave) . . . (if you don`t know where this is, you might not be fully 9/11 informed, FYI).
- Building 7 was not brought down by fire, but by the explosion of the gas tanks in the first few floors of the electrical substation (brought on by fire cause by the collapse and debris from the North Tower).
- Because the building collapsed from the exploding substation gas tanks, it might appear to some similar to a controlled demolition.
- Those visitin Ground Zero NYC can see in the new "Building 7" building that the first 10 floors aren`t occupied, and look odd because of the steel reinforcing around the elecrtical substation (a post-9/11 design, to prevent someone from targeting the substation to bring the building down).
- Many buildings were thought to be collapsing that day. (1) The Millennium Tower hotel on Fulton/Church, (2) the Royal Bank of Canada building on Liberty/Church, and (3) my home on Liberty/South End. Many people were cleared away from those buildings because they thought they would either come down, or they might have to bring them down themselves so make the site safe for rescue workers. It was a crazy day, people, and people clearing folks away from the site (or saying they might need to bring buildings down themselves) was not totally crazy.

Continute to question, but be careful not to allow our current hatred for our leader Bush to let us abandon Achem`s razor.

One INTERESTING THING you might check out if ur visiting ground zero is why folks that day thought the Liberty/Church building was going to collapse (Royal Bank of Canada building, with the 1st floor Brooks Brothers (which, along with the Burger King, was a morgue/triage center on 9/11 & after)). It turned out to be structuraly perfect. But, because people were confused that day, and because the girders going up the outside of the building APPEAR to bend (it`s an optical illusion), some folks thought the building might collapse. Optical illusions even influenced people in the craze of 9/11.

If you`re visiting Ground Zero - stop by and say hello to me after you`ve walked around the site. Or at last walk out to Battery Park and peer out the river to the Statue of Liberty (best views in Manhattan). It will be time better spent than buying the (illegal) 9/11 souvenirs from the street hawkers, the crazy old guy with the flute playing "America the Beautiful", the folks trying take your picture and sell it back to you, and the conspiracy theorists who try to evangelize at the site - all totally disrespectful at this damaged place.

Thanks

clericgram : LVL 13: VP 2.2: said:

clericgram

-4 votes NegativePositive

695 days 5 hours ago...

@NYCJockCub You do realize its the first time buildings fell from fire(and i say fire because thats the "official story").
Three buildings on the same day!You want us to belive the gas tanks exploded!!!!I call BULLSHIT!!Although i`ve never heard your theory before, it`s a theory that has no weight.
Those fires you speak of that were "supposably" caused by debri,are debunked by the video,clearly shows fires no where near those "gas tanks".
The planes that hit wtc 1&2 had jet fuel in them.I know that burns hotter than natural gas.
The tell tale sign from the video is the penthouse dropping in before anything else.For this to happen.ALL main support beams must cut.
The explosion from this "gas tank",does not have sufficient force to cut all support beams.

NYCJockCub : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

NYCJockCub

9 votes NegativePositive

695 days 5 hours ago...

^ huh?

The gas tanks are (and were) in the bottom of the building - the first ten floors. The fire in/around those v large gas tanks (and the resulting explosion) were what brought down the building, by most accounts. There were no fires? in the Sollie building? And you can tell by that video? Not sure I can believe that either - the entire area, and surrounding blocks were in flames (including the shorter tower buildings right in front and southeast of Building 7 - but you`ll know that, as a disciplined researcher). And, the fires remainded lit for months afterward. You will also remember, because of careful research, that the 9/11 towers debris stood 8-12 stories about the ground, that Building Seven was directly northeast of the North Tower, so the south part of Bldg 7 was likely waist deep in flaming debris as well).

But your argument might work better, from a different angle:
(1) There were FBI offices in Building 7, as well as the NYC disaster management headquarters (it`s where Guiliani amd Kerrik were until just prior to the South Tower collapse).
(2) One might guess that (since everyone in and around those buildings knew about the substation - it was a principal concern for Citibank/Sollie`s building safety plan - and for Moody`s today, the new primary Bldg 7 tenant) that someone "encouraged" the gas tank explosion ex-post-facto to cover up something in either the FBI offices or disaster management office.

I find it hard to believe that conspiracy theorists claim to have all the answers, but dont seem to have the most basic facts, THAT COULD HELP THEIR ARGUMENT (e.g. the substation/gas tanks), at their ready disposal. It leads me to believe the folks aren`t doing their research, and (if I am following the scientific method correctly) makes me question their methodology entirely (their methdology, but NOT their passion).

clericgram : LVL 13: VP 2.2: said:

clericgram

-3 votes NegativePositive

695 days 4 hours ago...

First let me address this,if you can tell me,which specific floor was this "gas tank" on?
I never said there was no fire.The fires i can see from the video were not intense fires.
To say there was enough fire to destroy those tanks is alittle far fetched.

"the entire area, and surrounding blocks were in flames"
All the hours of footage and testimony i`ve researched i`ve never seen or heard "the surrounding blocks were in flames".

"that Building Seven was directly northeast of the North Tower, so was likely waist deep in flaming debris at the time"
Again no one has footage or testimony of this "flaming debris" you speak of.
I`ll just pretend you weren`t slandering my research in your comment.
I understand your questioning things but it sounds like you got your mind set.
THIS IS THE FIRST TIME BUILDINS HAVE COLLAPSED due to fire.According to the official story.
Let me know if you got questions

velocity73R : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

velocity73R

7 votes NegativePositive

695 days 3 hours ago...

^^^NYCJockcub, you always comment on these video`s,and try to act as the authority to some sort of explosion caused by gas tanks. Enough of your crap. If there were infact tanks in that building they would have been re-enforced with enough material to hold the blast. No building code would ever allow that much of an explosive force to bring down a building, and not have it contained somehow. Because if this is the case, how many other buildings are sitting on this much gas, and it would make the supposed terrorist`s job so much easier, for they no longer have to rely on planes to bring down buildings, but instead sneak down to the basement and ignite the tanks, to bring down a building. Look at almost all of the users here on Spiked, few if any have there location in their handle name. You however do, and always` come up with this BS, on these videos`. My conclusion is your a shill for the gov`t to debunk any theories, or questions` other than the official explanation on the events that occured on 9/11. And your handle was picked to create the illusion of you having some sort of local knowledge, or real life experience that day. I call bullshit on you, and your idiotic comments...

clericgram : LVL 15: VP 2.4: said:

clericgram

-3 votes NegativePositive

695 days 3 hours ago...

Good point!

NYCJockCub : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

NYCJockCub

4 votes NegativePositive

695 days 2 hours ago...

^ ^ why attack me? You think I`m a government plant? Who is being paranoid here???

If you researched me, here you`d know I`m a big HOMO and GAY RIGHTS ADVOCATE, with far more focus on civil rights and arty stuff than on 9/11. I only like 9/11 conspiracy stuff because I see it everyday day. Anyway . . . as a gay dude, I`m not a likely candidate for a gov`t patsy (demonizing me was an `00 & `04 election strategy), though I have dated a navy guy.

Again, poor research.

As for a rebuttal, the tanks may have been reinforced, but likely not enough to withstand the stress/pressure/heat/possible puncture from a 110-story building falling next door.

clericgram : LVL 15: VP 2.4: said:

clericgram

-7 votes NegativePositive

695 days 1 hour ago...

"As for a rebuttal, one might say the tanks may have been reinforced, but likely not enough to withstand the stress/pressure/heat/possible puncture from a 110-story building falling next door."
Wow what a statement.
Keyword being POSSIBLE

mc77 : LVL 4: VP 1.3: said:

mc77

8 votes NegativePositive

694 days 23 hours ago...

1 a demolition crew willing to blow up a u.s building and stay hush hush after
2 thousands of police willing to aid in the greatest act of treason in u.s history, and remain hush hush about it
3 a reason to blow up a random building in no way iconic or a finacial asset during an attack on the most iconic building in the united states

explain these things and ill consider giving any validity to your hack research and bogus facts

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009