Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Cool Brain Phenomena: Spiked's Week In ...

EDITOR'S NOTE: This SpikedHumor article continues from Part 1 of Cool Brain Phenomena: Spiked's Week in Science.

Make sure to read and watch the video in Part 1 first or this part won't make sense.

Was It Really Blindness?

That's a very good question and the answer may be yes, no, or yes and no. There are other possibilities to explain this phenomenon, though from research inattentional blindness is readily explored.

The brain constantly processes and responds to stimuli. The question presented by the idea of inattentional blindness is do we miss -significantly- unexpected events, that is potential visual stimuli, when engaged in tasks? In application to the video, this means that you didn't recall the big dancing gorilla, much like the observers in the film, simply because you did not see it.

Inattentional Amnesia and Agnosia

However, what if you actually did see it? That is surely a possibility. In that case, it could indicate that our brains may experience a sort of memory lapse, that is inattentional amnesia. You may have very well seen the gorilla on the first time around, and even made a quick note of "Wow, a dancing gorilla!", and continued on your focused task of counting the passes.

By the time you were queried to what you saw in the video (the expected stimuli of a ball being caught N times), you may have totally forgotten about the gorilla. That is, you experienced amnesia.

Another possibility lies within being an agnostic of sorts. Who knows what that implies?

If you said, "I'm not certain", you are either witty or really just agnostic.

Inattentional agnosia in the event of focused attention and unexpected events, presents itself in a situation where your brain may experience an unknown "thing" but fail to categorize it, leaving it as an ignored enigma, or to say, unknown. That is, you were either partially or fully unable to recognize the gorilla using your typical visual center.

So though you may have actually seen the unexpected event, and it was somewhat observed and therefore processed, it may not register to the brain as being significant and thus not readily recalled or reported.

Implications and Things to Ponder

In all, this leaves us with more questions about the nature of the brain, the way we process events, our limits and even questions about the nature of our evolution.

An interesting study would be to have a group of people, a control, simply observe the overall scene without being told what to expect, including gorilla, while having their brain stimulation monitored. When the unexpected stimulus appeared, would their brains show similar patterns to those who were encouraged to focus on a narrow task?

This also brings another interesting question, or more an implication. Is narrowed focus and discard of seemingly irrelevant "data" a beneficial feature of our evolutionary heritage? Being in a world with increased stimuli, and a brain that is highly equipped to observe and plan based on stimuli, without being able to "tune out" so to speak there exists a possibility that the brain could overload -or not be able to readily focus on tasks- granted the inability to actively lose focus when needed (if through inattentional blindness, agnosia, or amnesia or other explanations).

Is the human tendency to naturally limit attention and discard unexpected stimuli when focused an evolutionary advantage, as opposed to cerebral limitation? One other interesting study would be to see how people with genetic conditions, such as ADD, would perform given the task set in the video. Would their results differ?

Whatever the answers to these questions may be, it is a definite that the human brain is a complex marvel.

So what do you make of all of this and how did you do in the initial experiment?!?

Sources
(listed as abstracts) Cognition. 2007 Apr 11 The attentional cost of inattentional blindness.

Brain Fun Facts


Conscious Cogn. 2006 Sep;15(3):620-7. Epub 2006 Feb 17. The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness

Pyschol Review 2005 Jan;112(1):217-42. What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-74 Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. (outdated, used to reference video)

  • dockwats
  • posted by dockwats
  • Date 7/1/2007 1:11:21 PM
  • Views: 11638
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Mind Control
  • Mind Control
  • The Entertainment Gathering 2008 Monterey, CA Dec 12th,. . .
  • Votes 3.93/5 - Views 237 - Comments 4
  • Video:Real Autopsy
  • Real Autopsy
  • A real-life medical autopsy of a young woman's corpse. . . .
  • Votes 4.57/5 - Views 5178 - Comments 41

View All



Rate This News:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

4.31 out of 5 based on 554 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

New URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

Elijah : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

Elijah

4 votes NegativePositive

557 days 8 hours ago...

I have got to know!!!!
How many passes were there?????????
Counted 14 first time and 15 the second time but the ball was occluded by a person for a second or so, so 16 would be possible.
PLEEEEEEEEAAASSEEEEE!!!!

rubberducky : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

rubberducky

Hidden (Show Comment) -17 votes

557 days 8 hours ago...

As posted previously, there were 42 passes. Man, you guys dissappoint me. :-(

scottdrocks : LVL 22: VP 3.1: said:

scottdrocks

17 votes NegativePositive

557 days 7 hours ago...

the point was not how many passes there were. it was like 14 or 15 but the whole thing was testing to see if you saw the gorilla

SuperDan : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

SuperDan

2 votes NegativePositive

557 days 7 hours ago...

I'd also like to toss in the idea that not once through the experiment did anyone ask if there was anything else noticed. they only asked about the passes. Granted, it's kind of something you'd point out automatically without having to be asked but as far as I'm concerned, in an experiment, I'd expect the gorilla to be asked about at a later time and only answer questions put to me about the passes. I saw it walk out of the middle or at least head to the side then went back to counting.

)v(iddy : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

)v(iddy

-4 votes NegativePositive

557 days 7 hours ago...

i saw the dumb gorilla now tell me how many passes!

AtroxMavenia : LVL 5: VP 1.4: said:

AtroxMavenia

6 votes NegativePositive

557 days 3 hours ago...

It was 15. I counted 15 passes both times that it showed it, then re-watched to confirm I was right.

moriwenne : LVL 29: VP 3.8: said:

moriwenne

Hidden (Show Comment) -8 votes

557 days 2 hours ago...

Many other things could have come into view. Who cares? If they say follow the ball we dont even look at the ppl let along a monkey coming in. This is so normal I don't see the point.

GotBoost? : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

GotBoost?

14 votes NegativePositive

557 days 2 hours ago...

I totally blocked out the people in black. Counted 15 passes both times. Never saw the gorilla until they pointed it out. I have ADD and I'm taking meds for it. It must mean they're working, since I was able to focus so intently.

Man...now that I think about it, one of the chicks in black could've flashed the camera and I never would've caught it! Damn!

dockwats (Admin) : LVL 65: VP 5: said:

dockwats

15 votes NegativePositive

557 days ago...

"Many other things could have come into view. Who cares? If they say follow the ball we dont even look at the ppl let along a monkey coming in. This is so normal I don't see the point."

The point is that despite an unexpected event being within your clear field of view, you may have missed it.

When such a thing happens, science must question why...hence why these types of experiments are conducted.

Neuroscience is a field (along with others)that has a long way to go, as the brain is ridiculously complex. Scientists don't fully understand why the brain excludes some sensory data from being stored, recollected, or even noticeably observed when we are fully focused on a task.

I explored three possible explanations in the article, any of which could be what actually happens when our brains enter a very focused state.

scr33ch : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

scr33ch

2 votes NegativePositive

556 days 23 hours ago...

i remember seeing this exact same experiment on a program on the discovery channel a long time, so as u might guess, i saw the gorilla from the get go.

what they also did was have that gorilla walk by or place it somewhere nonchalantly at times throughout the program (i think there were like 5 or 6 instances of it)and at the end let everyone in on it and of course i was amazed and didnt believe i wasnt able to notice it.

Yakaji : LVL 22: VP 3.1: said:

Yakaji

3 votes NegativePositive

556 days 20 hours ago...

This is what I get for being a grad student in psychology. I'm so unsurprised at the limits of cognitive function that this never even phased me. I'm well aware of the fact that I told my brain not to even bother processing black visual stimuli while watching the video, and I did not perceive the gorilla suit at all.

I did, however, count 15 passes.

(BTW, for SuperDan, I haven't read the academic papers in question, but I strongly, strongly believe participants were asked about the gorilla. The whole experiment would be pointless, otherwise, and would be laughed out of most journals. Participants were instructed to watch the passes made by the white-shirted players, specifically to focus their attention away from black visual stimuli, but considering that the goal of the experiment was to study inattentional blindness, of course they were asked about perceiving the gorilla AFTERWARD.)

n0val33t : LVL 17: VP 2.6: said:

n0val33t

4 votes NegativePositive

556 days 20 hours ago...

On the third go i noticed the gorilla and tought the whole video was som kinda spoof, cause franky it wasnt there the first 2 times and basically made no sence.. or so i tought untill i re-watched it.

Belive i got brain fucked

Henri_ : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

Henri_

6 votes NegativePositive

556 days 19 hours ago...

I counted 14 first, then 15. But pretty sure it was 15. I didn't notice the gorilla at all.

I think an autistic person might be able to see the gorilla, count the white "teams" passes and count the blacks "teams" passes all at once.
I read some place that some autistics can for example pick up all the conversation in a room and remember all the paintings at once, because their brain works too good. Therefore many autistic may not be very comfortable at social events, if he was to listen to and interpret every conversation at once. He would then maybe find his way into a corner like you see in the movies.

That was irrelevant, but 5/5 for both parts of the article.

kingduck : LVL 31: VP 4: said:

kingduck

3 votes NegativePositive

556 days 17 hours ago...

I counted 15 both times, I noticed the gorilla but just thought it was an extra black player and they we're cheating

FalloutReaction : LVL 1: VP 1: said:

FalloutReaction

3 votes NegativePositive

556 days 14 hours ago...

This kind of reminds me of that hypnosis you can experience while watching TV. You're so focused on the television, that your brain cancels out everything around it to help you concentrate.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Moderators Contest
Prize
Entry Dates: 11/4/2008-12/15/2008